In the dynamic world of firefighting, choosing the right monitor can be as critical as the tasks it’s designed to tackle. Wondering where to begin when specing your next monitor? First, we need to discuss the ongoing debate of Manual vs. Electric. Follow along as we reveal that knowing your specific operational needs is key to selecting your next monitor.

Manual monitors are considered a low-tech, cost-effective apparatus solution. Highlighted by their ease of install and simple mechanical controls, manual monitors allow users to quickly manipulate water streams. This simplicity is demonstrated on monitors like the Stinger^® (handwheel) or the Vulcan^® (tiller bar). Accessories like a Manual Extender further enhance the monitor’s versatility, enabling firefighters to overcome obstacles like raised roofs or ladder racks. However, there are considerations and drawbacks to manual monitors. The fireground environment includes hazards like obstructions, weather conditions, and manpower restraints. Restricted access to the top of the apparatus creates an unsafe environment for manual monitor operation. Lastly, operating a manual monitor requires a dedicated operator in turn reducing available manpower

Electric monitors provide flexibility, efficiency, and increase fireground safety. Electric monitors can be controlled from a remote position which frees up manpower and shortens deployment time. Advancements in technology allow operators to control the electric monitor from multiple locations using wireless handheld devices, pump panels, and or turntable controls. The integration of valve control into the remote control provides efficient and precise water flow management. Electric monitors can be integrated into the apparatus CAN Bus or Multiplex system which streamlines installation. The primary drawback to electric monitors is cost and budget restrictions.